RTX 2080 Ti vs RX 6700 XT: Specs, Performance and Value

For pure rasterized gaming the RX 6700 XT and RTX 2080 Ti are nearly tied, so the RX 6700 XT is the better value pick for budget-minded 1080p and 1440p buyers, while the RTX 2080 Ti is the better pick for anyone who wants ray tracing or DLSS, where it leads by a wide margin. Price on the used market usually decides it: the RX 6700 XT tends to cost noticeably less for the same native frame rates.

Head-to-Head Summary

• Raster performance: within about 3-8% in Tom’s Hardware’s data, with the RX 6700 XT ahead at 1080p and the RTX 2080 Ti ahead at 4K.
• Ray tracing: RTX 2080 Ti roughly 55-65% faster.
• Upscaling: DLSS 4 Super Resolution on the RTX 2080 Ti versus FSR 3.1 on the RX 6700 XT.
• Frame generation: neither gets DLSS Frame Generation; the RX 6700 XT adds AMD Fluid Motion Frames at the driver level.
• VRAM: 12 GB versus 11 GB, effectively equal.
• Power: 230 W versus 250 W.

Spec Table

The RX 6700 XT has far less raw memory bandwidth, but its 96 MB Infinity Cache keeps much of the working data on-chip. That works well at 1080p and 1440p and is why the RTX 2080 Ti’s 352-bit bus mainly pays off at 4K.

EVGA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti Black Edition Gaming, 11GB GDDR6, Dual HDB Fans & RGB LED Graphics Card 11G-P4-2281-KR (Renewed)

Included for 'RTX 2080 Ti vs RX 6700 XT: Specs, Performance and Value' because the listing specifies 11GB GDDR6, details this guide uses to compare options.

View on Amazon →

GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 2080 Ti Gaming OC 11GB Graphic Cards GV-N208TGAMING OC-11GC (Renewed)

Included for 'RTX 2080 Ti vs RX 6700 XT: Specs, Performance and Value' as a relevant option in this category; details come from the product listing.

View on Amazon →

Sapphire Technology Pulse AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT Gaming Graphics Card with 12GB GDDR6, AMD RDNA 2 (11306-02-20G) (Renewed)

Included for 'RTX 2080 Ti vs RX 6700 XT: Specs, Performance and Value' because the listing specifies AMD RDNA 2 (11306-02-20G) (Renewed), details this guide uses to compare options.

View on Amazon →

XFX Speedster SWFT309 AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT CORE Gaming Graphics Card with 12GB GDDR6 HDMI 3xDP, AMD RDNA 2 RX-67XTYJFDV (Renewed)

Included for 'RTX 2080 Ti vs RX 6700 XT: Specs, Performance and Value' because the listing specifies AMD RDNA 2 RX-67XTYJFDV (Renewed), details this guide uses to compare options.

View on Amazon →

Raster Performance

According to Tom’s Hardware’s 2022-2024 GPU hierarchy, the RX 6700 XT runs about 3-5% faster at 1080p, the RTX 2080 Ti is about 3% faster at 1440p ultra and roughly 8% faster at 4K ultra. Benchmark aggregators show a wider spread, from a near tie to about 20% in the RTX 2080 Ti’s favor depending on the game sample, and results swing title by title: some games favor AMD’s architecture, others NVIDIA’s. For practical purposes, treat the two as the same performance class.

In a typical demanding game at 1080p ultra, both cards land around the high 90s fps in Tom’s Hardware’s older suite, and at 1440p ultra both sit in the low-to-mid 70s. Newer releases run lower. Frame rates vary with game, settings, CPU and driver version.

Ray Tracing: A Clear NVIDIA Win

The RTX 2080 Ti’s first-generation RT cores and larger chip outperform RDNA 2’s ray accelerators by a big margin. Tom’s Hardware’s ray tracing tests show the RTX 2080 Ti about 57% faster at 1080p ultra and about 65% faster at 1440p ultra. In ray traced games, the RX 6700 XT often falls into the 20s-30s fps at 1440p without upscaling, while the RTX 2080 Ti stays meaningfully ahead, especially with DLSS enabled.

Upscaling and Frame Generation

RTX 2080 Ti

As an RTX card with Tensor cores, the RTX 2080 Ti supports DLSS 4 Super Resolution with the transformer model, which generally produces sharper and more stable images than FSR at the same internal resolution. It does not support DLSS Frame Generation (RTX 40 and newer) or Multi Frame Generation (RTX 50), but it can use FSR 3 frame generation in games that include it.

RX 6700 XT

The RX 6700 XT uses FSR 3.1 upscaling and FSR 3 frame generation, plus AMD Fluid Motion Frames, which can add frame generation in many DirectX 11 and 12 games through the driver. FSR 4 launched only for the RX 9000 series; AMD has announced official FSR 4.1 support for RDNA 2 cards in early 2027, which could narrow the image quality gap with DLSS once it arrives.

Today, DLSS is a genuine advantage for the RTX 2080 Ti in supported games: running DLSS Quality or Balanced lets it hold higher frame rates at better image quality than the RX 6700 XT using FSR 3.1 at the same setting.

VRAM Headroom

With 12 GB versus 11 GB, the two cards are effectively equal for memory. Both handle 1080p and most 1440p games at high to ultra textures. In the most demanding 2026 releases at 1440p ultra or 4K, both can approach their limits, and the difference of 1 GB rarely decides anything. Both are comfortably better than 8 GB cards in this respect.

Power, PSU and Size

Using GPU power plus CPU power plus about 150 W of headroom:

• RTX 2080 Ti: 250 W + 125 W + 150 W = about 525 W
• RX 6700 XT: 230 W + 125 W + 150 W = about 505 W

A quality 600-650 W power supply suits either card, matching the 650 W guidance both NVIDIA and AMD gave. Connectors differ: the RTX 2080 Ti reference design uses two 8-pin plugs, while the RX 6700 XT uses one 6-pin and one 8-pin, and partner models of both may differ. Both reference cards measure 267 mm and occupy two slots, so case fit is about the same; triple-fan partner versions can be longer and thicker.

The RTX 2080 Ti is a PCIe 3.0 card, while the RX 6700 XT supports PCIe 4.0 x16. Since both use a full x16 link, neither loses meaningful performance on a PCIe 3.0 motherboard.

Value Calculation

Launch prices were very different ($999 versus $479), but both cards now sell mainly used. Broad typical ranges are roughly $250-$330 for an RTX 2080 Ti and roughly $180-$240 for an RX 6700 XT. Because raster performance is about equal, the comparison is simple:

• RTX 2080 Ti at about $290 versus RX 6700 XT at about $210 for similar native frame rates
• That makes the RX 6700 XT roughly 28% cheaper per raster frame at mid-range prices.

The question is whether ray tracing and DLSS are worth around $80 extra. For players of ray traced single-player games, they often are. For esports and raster-heavy titles, the RX 6700 XT’s savings are hard to beat. The RX 6700 XT is also the younger card by about two and a half years, which matters for used-hardware wear.

Decision Table

Current-generation cards such as the RX 9060 XT 16GB, RTX 5060 Ti and Intel Arc B580 are worth comparing too, since they add newer upscalers and warranties. The older pair here makes the most sense at clearly lower used prices.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is the RX 6700 XT faster than the RTX 2080 Ti?

In rasterized games they are nearly equal. Tom’s Hardware’s data has the RX 6700 XT a few percent ahead at 1080p and the RTX 2080 Ti a few percent ahead at 1440p and 4K. With ray tracing on, the RTX 2080 Ti is much faster.

Which card is better for ray tracing?

The RTX 2080 Ti, by roughly 55-65% at 1080p and 1440p in Tom’s Hardware’s ray tracing tests. It also has DLSS to recover performance. The RX 6700 XT’s ray tracing is usable only with light effects.

Can the RX 6700 XT use DLSS?

No, DLSS is exclusive to NVIDIA RTX cards. The RX 6700 XT uses FSR 3.1 upscaling, FSR 3 frame generation and AMD Fluid Motion Frames. AMD has announced FSR 4.1 support for RDNA 2 in early 2027.

What PSU do I need for either card?

A quality 600-650 W unit is a safe choice for either. The RTX 2080 Ti needs two 8-pin connectors, while the RX 6700 XT needs one 6-pin and one 8-pin. Overclocked partner models may draw more.

Is 11 or 12 GB of VRAM enough in 2026?

For 1080p and most 1440p gaming, yes. Very demanding new games at 1440p ultra or 4K can push close to these limits. Both cards are in a better position than 8 GB alternatives.